THE SCIENCE
In World War Two the Chief of the Civil Administration of Lower Styria, Dr
Siegfried Uiberreither, turned down a request by the Bishop of Lavant, Ivan
Tomažič, for both German and Slovene to be permitted in churches.
"The Bishop pointed out that German was already used everywhere where the German
minority lived (Maribor, Celje and Ptuj) and suggested that at least for a
transition period both languages be permitted. But Uiberreither was convinced
that Slovenes in Lower Styria did not exist. Too clearly he said: 'The German
Reich doesn’t need those, who do not feel as Germans. They can find their place
in Carniola, Croatia, Serbia...' Tomažič’s intervention with the Gestapo
commander was also unsuccessful."
According to Damjan Hančič and Renato Podbersič in their contribution to "Crimes
Committed By Totalitarian Regimes" edited by Peter Jambrek and published by the
Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union in 2008:
"The goal of Nazi politics in occupied Slovene territory was obvious: the
ultimate elimination of the Slovene language from the territory and the
disappearance of Slovenes as an independent ethnic group." [50]
The acquisition of language is a complex neurological phenomenon. Neurological
observation in studies of language ability has awaited the advent of tools such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), Positron Emission
Tomography (PET) and Electro- and Magneto-encephalography (EEG+MEG).
Kisilevsky et al. (2009) presented fetuses with two speech recordings to test
whether they are sensitive to a change in speech from English
(a stress-timed language) to Chinese (often argued to be
a syllable-timed language), as compared to when they were presented with two
English recordings. [2]
Language acquisition starts in the womb - specifically the rhythm and melody of
the language. [3,4]
fMRI neuroimaging work looking at how the brain addresses the music of language
as opposed to the information decoding shows:
"Although the patient literature historically pointed to an important role for
the right hemisphere in affective prosody perception, the results were more
ambiguous for sentence melody processing; however, there was evidence for a
specific preference of the right hemisphere for certain acoustic cues (e.g., F0
contours) whereas the left hemisphere was more concerned with the processing of
discernible linguistic information (Baum & Pell, 1999). In later neuroimaging
work, Meyer, Alter, Friederici, Lohmann, and von Cramon (2002) presented normal
sentences, "syntactic" sentences (where content words were replaced with
pseudowords), and filtered speech preserving only prosodic cues. They observed
that, whereas left superior temporal regions responded more strongly to the
sentences in fMRI, the right temporal lobe preferentially responded to sentence
melody alone. Studies using tonal languages (e.g., Mandarin) developed this
finding, observing an overall preference for prosodic cues in the right
hemisphere for native and nonnative speakers, but a left hemisphere sensitivity
to linguistically relevant tonal information in the native group only (Tong et
al., 2005; Gandour et al., 2004)." [5]
Slovenia had no reasonable expectation any Anglophone immigrant would have been
accustomed from the third trimester of their mother's pregnancy to the Slovenian
zlogovna prozodija - which is comparable to that of Chinese.
The Complainant first heard Slovene at the age of 47. Is it easier or harder for a 47-year old adult to pick up zlogovna
prozodija, compared to a fetus or a toddler?
At that age, would it be easier to go from zlogovna to besedna prozodija or from
besedna to zlogovna prozodija, in your experience?
Before the Complainant ever appeared, Slovenians would have easily understood
from all their contacts with the outside world, the odds of foreigners being
regularly exposed, fetally or otherwise, to their syllabic prosodies or melodies.
According to a study of 27,119 second language learners from 88 countries with
49 mother tongues:
"Female learners consistently outperformed male learners in speaking and writing
proficiency in Dutch as a second language. This gender gap remained remarkably
robust and constant when other learner characteristics were taken into account,
such as education, age of arrival, length of residence and hours studying Dutch.
For reading and listening skills in Dutch, no gender gap was found." [49]
The female advantage with language begins early. Table 1 at [51]
collects 66 studies. Only one detected superior male progress.
"In a recent review on gender and language, Wallentin (2020) reported three
different hypotheses to explain putative language differences between genders:
(a) strongly innate differences linked to genetic sex; (b) cultural differences
linked to environmental asymmetries; and (c) interactions in which other
differences influence linguistic skills. The first hypothesis, is supported by
evidence that gender differences in language development depend on gender
differences in terms of the timing and composition of the hormonal cascades
during early gestation, and on the evidence that brain development in males is
delayed with respect to females. These result in infant gender differences in
left hemisphere maturity, and in the lateralization and organization of
functions within the brain (Friederici et al., 2008). Nonetheless, several
studies have failed to find gender-related differences in brain structure and
function that are relevant to language development during childhood, and that
might account for differences in language abilities. Conversely, when
gender-related differences in brain structure and function are seen, they do not
necessarily lead to differences in language test performances (Etchell et al.,
2018)." [51]
The effect of age on second language acquisition is popularly underestimated.
According to Scientific American:
"In one of the largest linguistics studies ever conducted — a viral internet
survey that drew two thirds of a million respondents — researchers from three
Boston-based universities showed children are proficient at learning a second
language up until the age of 18, roughly 10 years later than earlier estimates.
But the study also showed that it is best to start by age 10 if you want to
achieve the grammatical fluency of a native speaker.
"To parse this problem, the research team, which included psychologist Steven
Pinker of Harvard University, collected data on a person’s current age, language
proficiency and time studying English. The investigators calculated they needed
more than half a million people to make a fair estimate of when the 'critical
period' for achieving the highest levels of grammatical fluency ends." [6]
The study had a sample of 669,498 native and non-native English speakers.
Describing the change in learning ability as "precipitous" beyond age 17-18, the
authors list the possible variables influencing the superior language
acquisition ability of children:
"superior neural plasticity, an earlier start that gives them additional years
of learning, limitations in cognitive processing that prevent them from being
distracted by irrelevant information, a lack of interference from a well-learned
first language, a greater willingness to experiment and make errors, a greater
desire to conform to their peers, or a greater likelihood of learning through
immersion in a community of native speakers." [7]
If we didn't believe this already, we would wait until people were too old to go
to work, before settling them down to learn languages, freeing up children to
labour in the mines and factories.
We don't do this for a good reason: children are better at learning things than
their grown-up selves.
The existence of declining ability with age is not in debate, only the
modulating factors. It doesn't matter, because though not 19 or 18 when all this
began, the Complainant was not discouraged or inclined to believe the advice of one
moving-to-Slovenia website's advice about the language: "don't bother".
The word-music of Ptujščina is unlike any English prosody. The Complainant
- who is not built for sustained shouting - recalls being at home listening uneasily to the sounds of a fight building up,
out of sight outside:
voices louder and louder, the air dark with intoxicated-sounding, escalatingly plosive
exchanges, with women yelling out.
I peep out of the window to find a handful of unintoxicated, harmless,
respectable-looking middle class people exchanging parting words and goodnights
at the nearby road junction and no confrontation whatsoever.